|
THEORY OF
OPERATION
The theory of operation of the IFD has its roots in
concepts normally associated with biological systems.
As biological systems age, they undergo changes that negatively affect
their functional status. In other words they degrade with
age. Electronic systems are similar in that their environment
(temperature cycles, humidity, oxidation, pollution, vibration and
other mechanical stresses, etc.) also negatively affects their
functionality. The reliability of the electromechanical
components, such as wires, crimps, connectors, contacts, circuit
breakers, solder joints, relays, etc, is compromised in a series of
mysterious intermittent type failures that tend to worsen over time.
These anomalous operational failures can range in magnitude from
inconvenient or mission failures to critical safety risks and often to
preventable accidents.
In continuing with the biological analogy, the IFD employs artificial
neural networks both in its hardware and software. Their
use is best described with an example of the human brain and its
function of monitoring the nervous system.
When you put your shoes on, you don’t want to be told every second of
the day that your shoe is on, because all you really care about is when
the situation changes. We only want to know when the laces become
untied, a pebble gets inside or when some other change from the steady
state occurs. In accomplishing this task, the brain is
functioning using what has been called parallel distributed
processing. This processing is accomplished biologically using
what is termed as neural systems or neural networks. The human
neural system is listening to all sensors (nerves) in all parts of the
body continuously. It is not using some on-off sampling technique
which would require far too much processing time, but rather is
conducting more efficient continuous, analog monitoring of all points
all of the time. However, it is only interested in change or
differential information.
The continuous and distributed nature of the analog sensing is very
important because any change that occurs could come randomly from any
point and at any time. It is important to note that a random
event is an event, which by its very nature can occur somewhere in time
from the start point to infinity, but the important point is that you
don’t know when, where or at what severity it is going to happen.
This is why the scanning, sampling or interval related testing or
measurement function as is currently employed in virtually all other
digital-based test equipment CANNOT reliably detect these types of
random intermittent failures.
At its roots, the IFD’s neural-analog hardware network closely mimics
this parallel-distributed processing of the human brain to detect
random intermittence. Rather than spending the bulk of a
technology’s time taking and processing serial measurements of mostly
“good” readings (which you don’t need), the IFD efficiently
concentrates on detecting brief, low-level changes or upsets in
impedance. Because it’s parallel, it does it on all the connected
lines at the same time. The resulting increase in probabilities
to accurately detect and isolate an intermittent event is
staggering! In fact it’s some three million to one times more
probable on just a single test line. Multiply this amount times
the number of lines to be tested and you quickly see the significant
advantages of neural-analog technology for this type of problem.
The type of random failure event which derives from the electronic
aging processes that we are interested in detecting and evaluating are
circuit inter-connectivity type failures. The process that begins
the search for these intermittent type events usually comes from a
system or operator who has experienced some sort or electronics failure
during the operation of the system or equipment. When an attempt
is made to reproduce these failures on the ground (aircraft) or in the
shop or test lab, a common result is an inability to detect and/or
duplicate the previously observed failure.
At the root of this No Fault Found (NFF) problem is the aging process
itself, causing connectivity elements to degrade wherein they become
intermittent rather than completely open or sometimes shorted.
Due to the inherent on-off action of digital testers as well as the
defect itself being of an on-off nature, these random, in time and
place, failure “events”, do not synch-up well with the normally
unsynchronized digital-testing window. Small micro-breaks, which
are most likely to occur during functional operation and/or testing,
are often of a one-shot nature, and are simply not detected at test
time with traditional digital testing techniques. These
micro-break intermittencies are important to detect because during
operation in a stressful environment, they can just as easily open or
short sufficiently as to cause system failures. If this NFF
phenomenon is allowed to progress unchecked, it starts a tedious chain
of events resulting in even further degradation and mistrust of the
associated electronics systems as even perfectly good units are
targeted as possible defective units. The IFD was designed
to break this diagnostic circle of guesswork by testing for aging type
defects on a continuous basis using analog rather than digital means,
and by taking advantage of neural’s, all points-all-the-time sensing
technology.
|