| No-Fault
Finder
An Ogden, Utah company called
Universal Synaptics has developed a unit to help aircraft operators
track down hard-to-find intermittent electrical faults.
By Ed
Maher, Special to
Aviation Maintenance
The potential problems that wiring
can cause are legion, and range from the worst-case of an accident
to the more common mechanics response of "No Fault Found" to a
discrepancy write-up.
No-fault-found findings are turning
up at the extraordinarily high rate of 50 to 60 percent at
commercial airlines and military repair depots. Much of this is
attributable to the failure of ramp and bench tests to detect
age-related problems found in avionics boxes and other aircraft
components, not to mention old wiring.
No-fault-found is not simply a
matter of cost and wasted manpower. There are also serious safety
implications. Old, chaffed or abused wiring, corroded connectors,
cold solder joints, loose grounding lugs, and other electrical
components are a key cause of these mostly intermittent
faults.
Being age-related, these
connectivity problems are only going to get worse. Boeing estimates
that more than two-thirds of the large aircraft flying today will
still be flying in 20 years. In maintaining these aircraft, nothing
is more frustrating for a technician than to troubleshoot for hours
or even days and never find the fault that led to the pilot’s
write-up.
Fortunately, there is a tool that
can help track down intermittent electrical problems, especially the
type that result in no-fault-found situations. The Universal
Synaptics (Ogden, Utah) IFD-2000 (intermittent fault detector)
applies real-world tests to aircraft components and wiring and
captures data about intermittent failures at the precise nanosecond
that they occur, all without having to tear apart the
aircraft.
Like other testers, the IFD-2000
first tests to make certain all the wires in question are connected
and their connectivity signatures are correct. Unlike other testers
that repeatedly scan each individual wire in a system, over and
over, in an attempt to find an intermittent connection, the IFD-2000
employs a massively parallel, super-sensitive, hardware neural
network to monitor up to 256 test points (512 wire terminations)
simultaneously and continuously.
Because intermittent events occur
randomly in place, time, and severity, other testers on a fixed or
programmed measurement cycle can miss these anomalous events. The
overall boost in no fault found-detection capability when testing
complex multi-wire systems with this new technology is approximately
a million to one, according to Universal Synaptics.
The IFD-2000 can detect intermittent
wiring faults at extremely low levels, allowing repairs to be made
well before the faults cause major problems. The technician has the
capability to "predict" pending electrical failures, a huge safety
benefit over waiting for these failures to occur in
flight.
The IFD-2000 does require some
computer skill and tester familiarity to set up customized testing
applications. For those that need a little help getting started, the
user manual provides a step-by-step training guide which is used in
conjunction with the tester verification/calibration kit, to build
skill and confidence before actual testing begins.
For occasional diagnostic testing, a
few generic adapter harnesses can be used to connect the IFD-2000 to
a variety of aircraft or LRU circuitry. For more intense or periodic
testing, more sophisticated adapter harnesses, made to fit a
specific airplane type or LRU, would be necessary to make effective
use of this technology. However, the cost/benefit ratio of the
IFD-2000 is about 20 times greater than for a typical ATE setup when
high rates of NFF (no fault found) are present, according to
Universal Synaptics.
Intermittent testing can be
performed in automatic or program (manual) modes. The automatic mode
adjusts test stimuli and sensitivity levels as required for best
performance as the test runs. In the program mode, the stimuli and
sensitivity levels do not change during the test unless the operator
changes them.
With the test wiring harness hooked
up to the suspect system’s wiring, the IFD-2000 delivers the
programmed stimulus to the aircraft wiring. This same stimulus is
also fed directly into the IFD’s neural network for monitoring and
address decoding. Should an anomalous event occur, output-latching
circuitry captures the neural address of the intermittent fault
event and this data is matched with the system under test
nomenclature and is then displayed on a computer monitor graphically
in real time. A computer-generated voice also describes the fault
location via wireless headphones. This way, a technician that may be
as far away as 150 feet from the IFD-2000, say in the back of the
airplane creating some environmental stress, can monitor testing
progress without another technician’s aid.
To be effective, the test must
reflect as much as possible real-world conditions. Simulating a
typical in-flight "bump" on a large aircraft can be rather difficult
on the ground. Rather than having to apply large amounts of stress
to create wide-open intermittents, the IFD-2000 was designed to be
super-sensitive to extremely low level resistive events called
micro-breaks. Often, just the vibration of walking on the floor or
letting the temperature differentials stress the avionics components
is enough to trigger latent anomalies.
To allow this sensitivity, the
IFD-2000 is heavily protected against externally produced background
noise and ground-loop problems that will cause other equipment to
register false events. This protection against unwanted external
noise allows testing on the ramp or shop floor that is normally only
performed in EMD-protected laboratories.
In addition to wiring verification
and intermittency reliability testing, other testing/diagnostic
tools come with the IFD-2000. Wiring diagrams previously input into
the computer can be accessed by the technician and any failures
captured can be used to generate, on-the-fly, a complete diagram of
the circuit being tested.
Fault history during testing is
captured and can be printed for further troubleshooting and for
documentation purposes to show as hard proof that, in some cases, a
fault truly was not found.
Another mode, Signature Testing,
uses the hardware neural network to "ping" and collect sonar-like
responses from the system under test. These response patterns are
used to train a sophisticated software neural network to recognize
repeating circuit failures or marginal connectivity problems as
airline electrical and electronics systems age.
In addition to these tester-related
functions, this same software neural/case-based reasoner can be used
to diagnose aircraft problems not associated with any IFD-2000
testing. Technicians can create their own programs to diagnose any
system on the aircraft, using whatever external test equipment or
observations that may be available to describe the
problem.
Intermittent problems change, that
is their nature. Connections in connectors, relays, switches, and
circuit boards are under constant bombardment with vibration,
moisture, contaminants, heat, and electrical surges. The
manufacturer does everything it can to prevent these problems, but
no manufactured product is ever perfect. Especially airplanes that
are working 12 or more hours per day in widely varying and harsh
conditions.
While the IFD-2000 was originally
developed to test military avionics and has been used effectively
for reliability testing in the electronics manufacturing industry,
it has yet to see application by commercial airlines. It has
undergone extensive laboratory tests recently by Boeing Commercial
Aircraft Company. These results are still classified as proprietary
but are available to airline operators and government agencies. As
results from those tests become apparent, the IFD-2000 may soon see
widespread commercial aircraft and space application.
Properly working and tested wiring
is vitally important to the safety of all types of aircraft. Having
the right test equipment and testing plan is the first step to
preventing accidents due to age-related wiring
failures. Back
to this month's issue
|